*Hat tip to CJ
This is something I hadn't thought about and worth considering seriously. Some provision has to be made to prevent this. But since so many corporations are multi-national, how to stop it?
john Holmgren posted videos
3 years ago
5 comments:
great question!! That would make George Soros look like a piker!! Gonna try to get that question asked also
Writer of this article is overreacting. The Supreme Court decision was just and proper within the parameters of the first amendment.
Any potential abuse can be remedied by Congressional statute.
As far as foreign money skewing our election process, please remember James Riady's money to Clinton in 1990, the red Chinese money to Clinton in 94, and the illegal money to Obama from Moslem nations in 2008. Please recall that Hamas actually ran a phone bank for Obama from Palestine. Past abuses can be documented.
Scrapping one half of Mc Cain-Feingold was imperative in preservation of free speech, and breaking the union stranglehold on elections. To properly judge the decision analyze who voted for it, against, which groups and individuals laud the decision, and which talking heads and organizations are going ballistic....
the truth is that they have been giving money to candidates for a long time already. Maybe at least now all the contributions will have to be declared. But I'm sure the monsters will find a way to circumvent that too....they have lawyers to figure that out. Evil always finds a way.
GUESS WHAT: WE HAVE ONE IN THE WH ALREADY. HE RAISED ONE BILLLION FOR HIS ELECTION AND WON'T TELL US WHERE IT CAME FROM. SO WE HARDLY NEEDED A SUPREME COURT DECISION TO FIGURE THIS OUT. ALL THIS DOES IS THREATHEN THE MANCHURIAN CANDIDATE WHO IS THERE ALREADY. WHAT A LAUGH TO INSERT THIS THREAT INTO THE EQUATION AT THIS LATE DATE. TALK ABOUT CLOSING THE BARN DOOR.
They already did this with Obama. It's called the Internet. 750 million. Where did that all come from?
Post a Comment